The lack of knowledge often makes it possible for savvy educated to instill false beliefs in the minds of the less conscious. This strategy is often used by Catholics to push through some belief they have no rational meaning. It 's true, the church and the rational are two things that go together from the outset. But when the subjects dealt with by the church relate to scientific considerations it is clear that the two inevitably collide. What many serious is the instrumental use of the church of rational reasoning based on assumptions that are used for propaganda purposes interference. Assisted Procreation is the emblem. The reasoning is often based on which the opposition against the medical technology that helps many couples to have children is based on scientific considerations. Type: already the embryo is life. So what is an embryo? How do you know that the embryo is life? The answers to these and other similar questions require a scientific consideration on rational foundations. But no one denies that knowledge even if rational and utterly opposed to Christian teaching on procreation. Category: Holy Spirit, angels, children at 980 years, etc.. Then I wonder why accettarre reject the existence of the embryo and the chance to procreate so assisted, as both derive from the cognitive processes absolutely rational follow-up. Why believe in the existence of the embryo and do not believe in the possibility of assisting the formation of the embryo? Often one considers the miraculous formation of life. The Lord wanted. . . We thank the gentleman. . . But then the devil was blamed what used to treat disorders of fertility. Because God helps those in the sexual act is a child and who has spent his life to allow more children are born in spite of some problems? Qulacuno would respond if the Lord would have it, you can not have children for a reason. Shudder! So I would say, if the Lord wanted you to be a prostate cancer cure because you do it, there must be a reason! Or not?
You know what always replied to my reply? What
center! How
which centers? Center and how. If you use rational arguments consequential character I will respond rationally accordingly. And back to the point before. Too easy to use rationality when you agree and then reject it when it suits you more.
Now I do not know with certainty which of the two arguments is correct. But I believe that if I stop to reflect my scientific training has now overwhelmed with my bases in a Catholic irreversilile.
nu
0 comments:
Post a Comment